Successful Trademark Objection on HDS Trademark

文章摘要 本文通过HDS商标异议案,阐述了在航运业中,HDS作为“Hot Delivery Service”的缩写,已长期被广泛使用并成为行业通用服务名称,缺乏显著性,因此被商标局驳回注册。该案例凸显了商标异议中证明商标为行业通用名称的重要性,以及收集国内外证据的关键作用。实务价值在于,企业应警惕将行业通用术语注册为商标,并在异议程序中充分利用行业惯例、政府认可、媒体公开等证据,维护公平竞争。该案也提醒企业在商标申请前需进行充分的显著性检索,避免因通用性导致注册失败。

“HDS” is the abbreviation of “Hot Delivery Service”, which stands for a swift delivery service based on timed departure, timed arrival and timed picking products. “HDS” has been frequently referred to such swift delivery service since it appeared in some near-sea shipping line such as the Sino-Japanese route, in the beginning of this century. Thus, HDS has become a common name for such delivery service, which is widely recognized.


However, in the end of 2008, one Japanese company secretly applied to the Trademark Office of State Administration of Industry and Commerce (the “Trademark Office of SAIC”) for the trademark registration of HDS, intending to obtain the exclusive right to use HDS. After the application being accepted by the Trademark Office of SAIC, the Japanese company started to claim that it has obtained the trademark of “HDS”, so that the trademark cannot be used by any other companies. If Jin Jiang Shipping Company (“Jin Jiang”), as one of the leading companies in the shipping industry, is prohibited from using the “HDS” trademark, its business operation will be seriously impacted. Therefore, Jin Jiang engaged Mr. Chambers Yang to file a trademark objection against the “HDS” trademark registration to the Trademark Office of SAIC.


With Mr. Chambers Yang’s guidance and assistance, Jin Jiang collected a lot of evidences both in China and from overseas, including the evidence proving the name “HDS” had been commonly used among most companies in the shipping industry, “HDS” had been widely recognized by government authorities, industry associations, and public media, and such name had also been recognized by foreign government authorities and trademark registration offices. Therefore, Jin Jiang claimed that “HDS” is the abbreviation of “Hot Delivery Service”, and it will lack distinctiveness if this trademark is exclusively used in the certain field, so the registration of the “HDS” trademark shall be rejected. In the trademark objection application, Mr. Chambers Yang further analyzed the uniformity between the objected trademark and the commonly used service name in the industry, so the interest of the whole industry will be damaged if objected trademark is registered and exclusively used.


As the result, Trademark Office of SAIC deemed “HDS” as the abbreviation of “Hot Delivery Service”, which is a commonly used service name in the whole shipping industry, so it lacks distinctiveness. Therefore, in accordance with Subparagraph 2, Article 11, and Article 13 of the Trademark Law of People’s Republic of China, registration application of this trademark is rejected.

杨春宝一级律师简介

杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多

常见法律问题

什么是商标法中的通用名称?

通用名称是指某一商品或服务的通用称谓,在相关行业中已被普遍使用,不能区分商品或服务的来源。根据商标法原则,通用名称缺乏显著性,不得作为商标注册。实务中,判断通用名称需考虑行业惯例、公众认知、政府及行业协会的认可、媒体报道等。如本案中HDS被认定为航运业快递服务的通用缩写,因此无法获得专用权。企业应避免将通用术语申请注册,否则可能面临被驳回或无效宣告的风险。

如何证明商标缺乏显著性?

证明商标缺乏显著性需提供充分证据,主要从以下方面入手:一是证明该标识在相关行业中已被普遍使用,例如通过行业报告、协会证明、企业间合同、发票等显示长期、广泛使用;二是证明该标识已被公众或政府机构视为通用名称,如媒体报道、官方文件、字典收录等;三是收集海外相关证据,包括外国商标注册机构的驳回决定或行业惯例文件。本案中,锦江航运通过收集中国及海外证据,证明HDS为行业通用名称,最终成功异议。实务中,证据应形成完整链条,并注意时效性和地域性。

商标异议的流程与证据要求有哪些?

商标异议流程通常包括:在商标初步审定公告后三个月内,向商标局提交异议申请,说明理由并附证据。证据要求包括:证明异议人主体资格、证明被异议商标违反法律原则(如缺乏显著性、属于通用名称等)、证明自身权益受损或公共利益受影响。具体证据类型有:商标使用证据、行业共识证明、政府或行业协会的认可文件、媒体报道、海外同类案例等。本案中,异议人通过收集中外证据,证实HDS为通用名称,从而说服商标局驳回申请。实务中,证据需真实、合法、关联,且最好经过公证认证,以增强证明力。

以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn

  • 本站声明:本站所载之法律论文、法律评论、案例、法律咨询等,除非另有注明,著作权人均为站长杨春宝高级律师本人。欢迎其他网站链接,但是,未经书面许可,不得擅自摘编、转载。引用及经许可转载时均应注明作者和出处"法律桥",并链接本站。本站网址:https://meetlawyer.com/。
  •  
  •         本站所有内容(包括法律咨询、法律法规)仅供参考,不构成法律意见,本站不对资料的完整性和时效性负责。您在处理具体法律事务时,请洽询有资质的律师。本站将努力为广大网友提供更好的服务,但不对本站提供的任何免费服务作出正式的承诺。本站所载投稿文章,其言论不代表本站观点,如需使用,请与原作者联系,版权归原作者所有。

发表回复