A Chinese court sentenced four people to prison and levied roughly $1.6 million in fines against them for various counts of software copyright infringement, in what an industry group cheered as a major victory in a market where piracy is rampant.
Hong Lei and Sun Xianzhong, founders of Chengdu Gongruan Network Technology Co., and two others within the company were sentenced Thursday to 2 to 3 1/2 years in prison and collectively fined 11 million yuan ($1.6 million) by a district court in the eastern Chinese city of Suzhou. The state-controlled Xinhua news agency called it China's biggest software copyright infringement case.
The defendants were accused of illegally distributing software, including Microsoft Corp.'s Windows operating system, which they re-created and distributed free under their own brand on Tomatolei, a Web site through which they offered free software downloads. The popular Windows clone was called Tomato Garden Windows XP.
Reached by phone, Mr. Hong's father declined to comment. The defendants' attorneys couldn't be reached.
'This is the first successful criminal case to crack down on such large-scale online software piracy in China,' said the Business Software Alliance, a Washington-based industry group. According to the BSA, which represents a number of multinational technology companies including Microsoft, Intel Corp. and Adobe Systems Inc., Tomatolei was China's largest online software piracy syndicate. The case 'marks a milestone in China's efforts to crack down on Internet piracy,' it said. Authorities moved against Tomatolei after receiving complaints from the BSA last year.
Lawyers say the verdict is important because it is often difficult to seek criminal charges against software pirates in China, where many companies complain that rampant copyright infringement hurts their business.
Yang Chunbao, an intellectual-property lawyer for Haworth & Lexon in Shanghai, said makers of pirated software are often sued in civil court for tens of millions of yuan but fined only a fraction of that. This recent sentence was 'really harsh,' he said. 'The fine amount is unusual.' It's unclear how aggressively China will continue to pursue piracy, however.
Microsoft and other copyright owners have long complained that the Chinese government's punishments for piracy have been too soft, allowing companies like Gongruan to flourish. Just this week, California Democrat Howard L. Berman, chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said China's 'weak and ineffective efforts to stop intellectual property theft' cost billions of dollars a year.
In a statement, Microsoft said this new sentence would serve as a warning to counterfeiters of software products.
In China, computer users can easily pirate software for less than $2, or download software like Tomato Garden free of charge. Some software resellers would provide Tomato Garden's pirated Windows software on computer disks or would offer to preinstall the operating software on new PCs. Microsoft estimates that a significant portion of users in China unknowingly use pirated versions of Windows because it is so easy for sellers to preinstall the software and then sell the PCs at lower prices.
The case has sparked discussions on China's Internet forums, where thousands of users admitted to using Tomato Garden.
One user from Guangdong province said that without pirated software, 'I wouldn't have the chance to use a computer. . . . I show my respect to those who could decode Microsoft's software and share it with others.'
Microsoft cut prices last year to encourage consumers to use legitimate versions of its software. In China, home and student versions of Microsoft Office cost less than $30. The software starts at about $100 in the U.S.
China, the world's second-largest personal computer market by shipments, is increasingly important to technology companies world-wide, especially as companies and consumers are spending less in the wake of the economic downturn.
(Source: The Wall Street Journal, Augest 25th, 2009)
相关法律服务
杨春宝一级律师简介
杨春宝一级律师,大成上海高级合伙人、资本市场部主任、国资基金研究中心主任,大成中国区私募基金专业带头人、科技与文化法律研究中心联合牵头人。执业30余年,长期从事私募基金、投融资、并购重组法律服务,尤其对对赌研究颇深且具有非常丰富的实战经验,并专注于金融机构股权投资业务。2004年起多次入选The Legal 500"私募基金"和"公司与商业"等境内外各类律师榜单,代理的中国法院首例适用外国法律审理外国公司的董事损害小股东权益纠纷案入选上海高院发布的《上海法院域外法查明典型案例》和威科先行"要案头条"。入选上海涉外法律人才库、上海市司法局鼎新法治人才库、上海国有企业改制法律顾问团,具有上市公司独立董事任职资格,系多家知名高校的兼职教授或兼职研究生导师及上海市商务委跨国经营人才培训班讲师。出版《私募股权投资基金风险防控操作实务》等16本投融资法律专著。了解更多常见法律问题
软件盗版刑事追诉的条件是什么?
根据中国刑法及著作权法相关规定,对软件盗版行为追究刑事责任需满足以下条件:第一,侵权行为必须达到一定规模或情节严重,通常以非法经营数额、复制品数量、传播范围等作为衡量标准。实务中,非法经营数额较大(如达到一定金额)或复制品数量较多(如复制发行他人计算机软件作品数量较大)是启动刑事追诉的常见门槛。第二,行为人主观上具有故意,即明知是盗版软件仍实施复制、发行、通过信息网络传播等行为。第三,行为需侵犯他人著作权,未经著作权人许可,且无合理使用等法定免责事由。在司法实践中,法院会综合考量侵权时间、获利金额、社会影响等因素。本案中,被告通过网站大规模免费分发盗版Windows系统,非法经营规模巨大,故被判处实刑并处罚金。实务操作指引:权利人发现侵权后,应首先固定证据(如公证下载、购买侵权产品),计算非法经营额或侵权复制品数量,再向公安机关报案或向法院提起刑事自诉(在符合条件时)。风险提示:若侵权行为规模较小或未达到刑事立案标准,可能仅承担民事赔偿责任或行政处罚,刑事追诉存在一定门槛。常见争议焦点:非法经营额的计算方式(是否包含成本、广告收入等)、侵权复制品数量的认定(是否包括下载次数、安装次数)、以及“未经许可”的证明责任分配。
企业如何防范员工使用盗版软件的法律风险?
企业使用盗版软件可能面临民事侵权赔偿、行政处罚甚至刑事责任,因此必须建立有效的合规管理制度。具体防范措施包括:第一,建立软件正版化政策,明确要求员工仅使用经合法授权的软件,并纳入员工手册或劳动合同。第二,定期开展软件资产审计,盘点公司所有计算机设备上安装的软件,核查其授权许可类型、数量及有效期,对未经授权的软件立即卸载或补购授权。第三,加强员工教育培训,告知使用盗版软件的法律后果(包括公司可能被诉赔偿、声誉受损,以及个人可能承担连带责任),并设立举报机制。第四,对于研发、设计、财务等关键岗位,应优先采购正版软件并保留采购凭证、许可证文件。第五,在软件采购合同中明确供应商的授权真实性,避免从非正规渠道购买。第六,若发现员工私自安装盗版软件,应及时纠正并视情节给予纪律处分,以证明公司已尽到合理注意义务,避免被认定为“明知或应知”侵权。根据司法实践,法院在认定企业责任时,会考虑企业是否采取了合理有效的管理措施。若企业未能证明已尽到注意义务,可能被认定为共同侵权,需承担连带赔偿责任。风险提示:即使企业未直接使用盗版软件,若允许他人(如外包人员)使用公司设备安装盗版软件,也可能面临责任。此外,使用开源软件时需注意其许可证条款,避免因违反开源协议引发纠纷。常见争议焦点:企业是否“知道”或“应当知道”员工使用盗版软件,以及企业是否采取了合理预防措施。
软件著作权侵权赔偿数额如何确定?
根据中国著作权法及相关司法解释,软件著作权侵权赔偿数额的确定遵循以下原则:首先,按照权利人因侵权所受到的实际损失计算;实际损失难以计算的,可以按照侵权人的违法所得给予赔偿;两者均难以确定的,由法院根据侵权行为的情节,在法定赔偿限额内酌情确定。法定赔偿额的上限为500万元人民币(根据2020年修正的著作权法)。对于软件著作权,实际损失通常包括正版软件销售利润的减少、许可费损失等;侵权人违法所得包括销售盗版软件的收入、广告收入、会员费收入等。在计算时,权利人需提供证据证明其软件的市场价格、销售数量、利润空间,以及侵权行为的持续时间、传播范围等。实务操作指引:权利人应尽可能收集侵权人销售记录、财务账册、服务器日志、支付记录等证据,必要时申请法院调取或进行证据保全。若无法精确计算,可主张适用法定赔偿,并提交侵权行为的严重性(如大规模网络传播、多次侵权、恶意侵权)作为从重赔偿的依据。本案中,法院对四名被告合计判处罚金1100万元,体现了对大规模盗版行为的严厉制裁。风险提示:法定赔偿虽简化了举证,但赔偿金额可能低于实际损失,权利人应尽量提供充分证据以争取更高赔偿。常见争议焦点:侵权人违法所得的计算是否剔除成本;权利人实际损失是否包括因盗版导致的价格下降或品牌贬值;以及法定赔偿中“情节严重”的认定标准(如是否属于重复侵权、是否构成刑事犯罪等)。
以上内容仅供参考,不构成法律意见。如需专业法律服务,请联系杨春宝一级律师:chambers.yang@dentons.cn




